‘Poisoning attempt’ charges filed against French H1N1 campaign
Print version
Email to a friend
A H1N1 virus. (c) Scherle.com
In what is being seen as the first of many such actions to come, nine individuals have filed formal charges claiming that the H1N1 campaign is a deliberate attempt to poison the French population.
These charges, which were filed yesterday, could not come at a more inopportune moment for the government and health specialists. The vaccination campaign got underway last Tuesday in a climate of national skepticism as to the vaccine’s safety and efficiency, and this news will surely boost the morale of the increasing number of anti-vaccine lobbyists who are beginning to organize their resistance to any attempt to vaccinate the population against H1N1.
Nine inhabitants of the Isére region of France are cited as joint plaintiffs in the case, including a health sector worker, a teacher and a radio talk show host. They met each other at various public meetings held to denounce the vaccine’s alleged health risks.
The charges take the form of a ‘plainte contre X’ which means that the perpetrator of an alleged crime or felony is not known, or is not named, in the charge sheet. This is a commonly used manner of filing complaints in France, particularly where the charges relate to supposed government implication in alleged breaches of the law. In cases where those trials proceed after prior examination of the facts, the specific persons or organizations concerned are designated and charged as the trial proceeds.
Jean-Pierre Joseph, the plaintiffs’ lawyer, describes the vaccination campaign as “A veritable attempt to poison.” He confirmed that the charges were filed at the High Court in Grenoble before the court’s senior examining magistrate. He said other court cases involving other plaintiffs would begin soon
The various charges filed included one of “Attempting to administer substances…of a nature which could result in death.”
“The aim is to put a stop to what we consider to be an act of poisoning,” according to Joseph. “The interest of this action is that people in France now have a means by which to express their concern as citizens by saying publicly “We are aware that the vaccination campaign is a swindle.”
Similar court actions are planned in other areas of the Isére, as well as in Paris, Pau and Nantes, and several hundred vaccine opponents are beginning to organize themselves on the internet with a view to filing class action charges.
The government and health authorities are currently battling to persuade people to get vaccinated against increasingly difficult odds. Opposition to the campaign has been increasing steadily, and various polls taken over the last few days put the figure for those who do not intend to get vaccinated as high as 70 percent.
Their task is being made even more arduous by the fact that while authorities believe on the one hand that vaccination is essential despite negative public reaction, the French have traditionally proved to be very quick to condemn and file charges in cases where not enough was said to be done to prevent other medical mishaps such as the Mad Cow outbreak and an AIDS contamination case, in which several people died and many more became HIV positive after receiving AIDS-contaminated blood transfusions in hospitals.
That signifies that the authorities have very little room to maneuver and are more or less obliged to continue the campaign in order to avoid similar charges should they decide or be forced to abandon the campaign and high numbers of people die as a result of not being vaccinated.
del.icio.us |
Digg
Also, I am a little worried about the safety of the vaccine. Did you know the U.S. government gave immunity to the vaccine manufacturers? If people get sick they cannot sue the manufacturers or the government, although I understand there is limited funding set aside for compensating people who react badly to the vaccine. At least the vaccine isn't mandatory in the legal sense but the authorities have created a hysterical population that is clamoring for the vaccine. There's a huge pent up demand. A manufacturers' dream.
Consider this;
There is no known safety guarantee for the vaccine in mass inoculation. It's a rushed one-off job due to the circumstances. Even the makers have said that zero risk with it is impossible. So, having said that, how can they be held accountable for any unknown-at-this-time problems?
This debate needs to be sorted out, and for me the issue is simple.
No-one is going to fund research and produce a vaccine in this kind of a hurry and put itself on the line if unforseen problems arise. But at the same time, if the government doesn't provide a vaccine, a lot of people are going to be fed up at not having the option to get vaccinated.
I don't see what's wrong with voluntary vaccination. If you take it and it works, cool. If it kills you, that's the way it goes.
But I would not withdraw that option any more than I would support an end to it. Imagine if millions died because no vaccine was there, and halfway through the epidemic, when its too late, they discover that the vaccine works and is reasonably safe?
Those who supported an end to vaccination would then have a lot of deaths to explain.
I believe people should be able to choose.
:)
On the same day that the USA declares a state of urgency and that demand for the vaccine is outstripping supply, IFOP, one of the two biggest poll organisations in France, has just announced in poll results today that only 7 per cent of French people "will certainly" get vaccinated, and that a further 10 per cent think they will "probably" get vaccinated.
Which means that 83 per cent have the intention of "not," or "probably not," getting vaccinated.
I really don't know how to explain the difference (moreover I am not qualified to do so,) but it cannot be denied that the stakes in this issue are very high, whatever one's point of view.
These blood types have damaged DNA/proteins and weakened immune system due to unbalanced pH levels. Type B is acidic and types A/O are alkaline.
Blood type AB has neutral 7.00 pH and has normal DNA and immune system.
As of 2005, the blood pH of blood types A/O was set up to average pH of 7.54 and the blood type B was set up to a higher acidity level (lower pH). The blood pH (blood types A,B & O) has been carefully managed through methodical, intentional poisoning to reach the current life-critical levels specifically targeting this point in time. The vaccines, planned long ago for this period in time, are formulated to push the blood pH past the critical points, in order to kill and disable many.
The number of the poisoned blood types is quickly approaching 200 million in the U.S.
For further explanation: http://www.unveilingthem.com/PoisoningOfMankindCopperDeficiency.htm
C.A. Bouthillier
Research Analyst
And thank you for your input. I wasn't aware of that issue and will certainly be visiting the site to which you were kind enough to post the URL.
Have an excellent day,
:)
Conspiracies and religion = what an unhealthy mix!
People claiming that vaccine manufacturers intentionally want to "kill" people is just ridiculous.
Putting morality aside, from a practical standpoint, who would be left to buy vaccines next year if they killed people? Duh.
DUH!!
As you say Kat. I do not need to be persuaded that there are political and commercial interests at stake here, that seems evident, but from there to mass annihilation of the 'people' is a large leap of the imagination to say the least lol!!
Vaccines were developed under the cover (lie) they will protect from harmful viruses and bacteria, and were never needed and are another fraud perpetrated on the people. Harmful viruses and bacteria thrive and replicate in the blood types A, B & O, which have blood pH that has deviated away from a neutral pH of 7.00. An unbalanced blood pH prevents normal activation and function of the enzymes required to fight off harmful viruses and bacteria. Enzymes are made up of proteins and if any are missing or malformed due to copper deficiency, they do not activate and function at normal levels. A neutral blood pH of 7.00 destroys/removes harmful bacteria and viruses because the enzymes activate and function at normal healthy levels due to sufficient levels of copper, providing proper concentration of hydrogen to form the protein bonds. Thus, the blood type AB is the normal healthy blood type with a neutral pH of 7.00 and has healthy immune function, and normal DNA.
Vaccination is in fact the most effective and efficient method to transport poisons more directly into the liver, to displace and deplete copper from that location. The liver is where much of the blood proteins (and other proteins) are synthesized and is where the greatest percentage of copper is stored. Copper is vital in protein synthesis. Vaccine poisons settle and accumulate in the liver depleting and displacing copper, thereby causing a mineral imbalance and deviation from a 7.00 pH, resulting in near-immediate massive DNA damage, by disrupting normal protein synthesis. This aberration in protein synthesis is indicated in malformed and missing proteins, reflected in acidic blood (type B) or alkaline blood (types A & O), depending on individual propensity of the mineral imbalance, i.e., toward acidic or alkaline. As of 2005, the blood pH of blood types A/O was set up to average pH of 7.54 and the blood type B was set up to a higher acidity level (lower pH). The blood pH (blood types A,B & O) has been carefully managed through methodical, intentional poisoning, to reach the current life-critical levels specifically targeting this point in time. The vaccines, planned long ago for this period in time, are formulated to push the blood pH past the critical points, in order to kill and disable many.
It's irresponsible to make such blanket statements. Certainly there are serious problems with the systems governing development and dissemination of vaccines. Our governments have done a very poor job of prioritizing human needs vs. corporate profits. But don't lose your perspective and go off the deep end. Below is a link to a very rational article on the history of vaccines and immunization.
http://tinyurl.com/8s52k9
They also elect a government or President and live with that for the mandate.
They are free to get vaccinated or not, what ever the authorities say.
Propaganda, be it from government and business or from those who want to replace that with their own brand of control, is not what's needed.
I do not want to see martial law forcing me to get vaccinated.
On the other hand, nor do I want anyone bringing law suits or introducing their own political agenda in the guise of anti-vaccin-and-system paranoia into this issue and stopping me from getting vaccinated if I choose to do so.
This is my choice, if that's OK.
(the point here is to make as much money as they can NOW, tomorrow...... will be the cure for the disaster they are doing NOW)
I am definitely against mandatory vaccination - no medical intervention, even things like vaccination or fluoride, should be made obligatory. Each individual should be free to choose for him/herself.
However, when deliberate lies, obfuscation and deceit are perpetrated by a government on its population in order to line the pockets of organisations such as the drug companies, we have a right - I would even say a moral duty - to fight back, and if a lawsuit is the most effective way to do so, then I support that.
Sorry, C.A. but without an explanation of why the vaccine manufacturers want to off so many people, we have no reason to believe that these are nothing more than the same rantings of the conspiracy theorists who say exactly the same thing about the iluminati, and likewise give no explanation as to why they want to kill off 4/5 of the world's population.
Could it be that no reasons are ever stated because the theories are figments of imaginations gone wild and have no basis is truth whatsoever?
Also, Michael, have you seen the neurological findings of Dr. Moulden with regard to vaccines? His findings make me question the safety of All vaccines: http://bit.ly/N5y5G
For the record I am also against vaccinations and the propaganda promoting the masses of sheep. I am a HUGE proponent of educating the people of the obvious toxins in vaccines, like Mercury and Aluminum to name only a few. If people know it's toxic to consume Mercury via Salmon yet they don't mind directly injecting Mercury 25000 times the level found in any Salmon fish, well let the the Survival of the "Smartest" commence and demonstrate Darwinism. The masses are uneducated and DO NOT know how to read between the lines. It's equivalent to taking candy from strangers.
To everyone reading this article... to your health and your smarts! Good job! Keep digging and asking questions!
<a href="http://www.zoombits.co.uk/christmas-gifts">gift ideas</a>
However, when deliberate lies, obfuscation and deceit are perpetrated by a government on its population in order to line the pockets of organisations such as the drug companies, we have a right - I would even say a moral duty - to fight back, and if a lawsuit is the most effective way to do so, then I support that.
wouldn't you want people to live to make it through the swine flu so that they could get old, develop heart disease, diabetes, cancer, or any other long-term disease so that you could make even more off the back of it? T
Post your comment