Home | Health | Can man-made ‘volcanoes’ slow down climate change?

Can man-made ‘volcanoes’ slow down climate change?

email Email to a friend
Font size: Decrease font Enlarge font
image Eruption of Mount Pinatubo in the Philippines in 1991. Wikipedia

Britain’s Royal Society thinks it may have found a way to cool down the planet. The Society is backing research into the "volcano" idea, which simulates the effects of volcanic eruptions which spew enormous quantities of dust into the atmosphere.

The Royal Society is Britain and the Commonwealth’s biggest and most prestigious independent scientific academy, and this week sees the launch of its new drive for a major programme of studies designed to determine how geo-engineering could help to reduce the rate of global warming, says The Times.

Geo-engineering is defined by the Society as being "the study and use of options that would involve large-scale engineering of our environment in order to combat or counteract the effects of changes in atmospheric chemistry.”

The initiative begins in the midst of many uncertainties concerning the possible outcome of the United Nations-sponsored climate talks in Copenhagen in December which are supposed to agree on global cut quotas in carbon dioxide emissions. Previous talks have not led to substantial progress being made on the issue and many scientists consider geo-engineering to be a kind of “Plan B” if the talks fail.

One major geo-engineering option that the Society supports is the introduction of sulphur-based particles into the upper-atmosphere.

Ken Caldeira is an earth scientist at Stanford University, California. He is also a member of a Royal Society working group on geo-engineering and he says that the theory behind the idea is that the particles would reflect the sun’s rays, along with the heat that they carry, back out into space.

Caldeira seems so sure of the idea’s feasibility that he says, “If I had a dollar for geo-engineering research I would put 90 cents of it into stratospheric aerosols and 10 cents into everything else.”

The origins of the so-called stratospheric aerosol theory date back to the eruption of Mount Pinatubo in 1991. It was the second biggest volcanic eruption of the 20th century and it propelled up to 20 million tons of extremely small sulphur particles into the atmosphere. Those particles cooled the planet by around 0.5 per cent before they finally drifted back down to earth.

The interest in so-called aerosols is linked to the eruption of Mount Pinatubo in the Philippines in 1991, the second largest volcanic eruption of the 20th century. The explosion blasted up to 20m tons of tiny sulphur particles into the air, cooling the planet by about 0.5C before they fell back to earth.

Brian Launder, a professor at Manchester University and a working group member said that in the absence of CO2 emission reduction or geo-engineering “civilisation as we know it will end within our grandchildren’s lifetime.

“The only rational scheme is to reduce the sunlight reaching Earth and to reflect back more of it.”

Some scientists think that the planet’s temperature could rise by 5C before the year 2100 and they predict that CO2 emissions must fall to 20 billion tons a year by 2050 if a disaster is to be averted.

The Royal Society is pressing ahead with its support for the plan despite the doubts expressed by some scientists that CO2 emissions could drop quickly enough by adopting it, or that using it would mean that if ever they stopped, the earth would heat up disastrously quickly.

Tim Lenton, professor of earth sciences at the University of East Anglia, has just finished research which compares the different ideas for geo-engineering. His research will be used by the Society.

Lenton says that the results mean that “We estimate that 1.5-5m tons of sulphate particles could be released [artificially] into the stratosphere each year on a recurring basis. That is quite a small amount, which makes it potentially economically viable, but it could reduce global temperature rise by up to 2C.”

He thinks that the idea of “man-made volcanoes” is the most promising of all the other geo-engineering projects he studied.

They were:

  • Giant sun reflecting mirrors in space (“Science fiction” says Lenton.)
  • Artificial cloud-whitening for sun reflection (Said to be a risk to rainfall levels.)
  • Using chemicals and plankton to accelerate the rate of CO2 elimination from the air. (Too long to implement.)

Lenton’s research and the Royal Society’s support mean that the “man-made volcanoes” project would seem to have time to prove its worth from further research.

Michael Cosgrove is a Lyon, France-based freelance journalist, business translator, and interpreter and teaches English to French businesspeople. He publishes frequently at Digital Journal.com

Subscribe to comments feed Comments (10 posted):

Brick veneer on 09/02/2009 03:05:51
avatar
Really?
Thumbs Up Thumbs Down
0
Brick veneer on 09/02/2009 03:08:31
avatar
Brian Launder, a professor at Manchester University and a working group member said that in the absence of CO2 emission reduction or geo-engineering “civilisation as we know it will end within our grandchildren’s lifetime.
Thumbs Up Thumbs Down
-1
Nora on 09/02/2009 12:18:57
avatar
It's always exciting to hear about new technology that could help us fight climate change. But I have to say, I hope the possibility of this solution doesn't distract us from taking action on the options we already have: reducing carbon emissions and transitioning to cleaner, safer fuel sources. There's a bill in Congress right now, the American Clean Energy and Security act, that puts us on the path to renewable fuels while also supporting U.S. job growth. The clean energy industry is one of the only sectors growing right now, and with ACES, it will be flushed with new investment that can support job growth across the country.

We already have the technology to transition to renewables. Let's make that our first priority before trying something with a lower likelihood of success. Call your senators and let them know: Americans want the energy bill to pass!
Thumbs Up Thumbs Down
0
Malcolm Newell on 09/03/2009 04:02:16
avatar
Accelerating Methane releases are already occurring as the result of temperature rises which have already occurred and without action those temperature rises are going to continue. If we do not actively reduce CO2 level AND temperatures those CH4 releases (and the resulting CO2 and GW will continue to accellerate evver more rapidly as temperatures rise.

By compelling aircraft to fly at "condensation trail" levels during daylight hours and banning night time flights at these levels-it will reduce Solar energy absorption and allow more overnight loss of IR heat radiation to space. Couple this with the use of high sulphur fuel when flying at height and we have a Geo-engineering application which is available NOW.
Commercial shipping is also available NOW to be utilised for large scale fertilisation experiments and once proven could be utilised on a world wide scale in a matter of 2 to 3 years.
Thumbs Up Thumbs Down
0
Michael Cosgrove on 09/04/2009 08:10:27
avatar
Thanks for your comments everyone.

It would appear from reading them that most people would agree with Hora when he says that we can't just sit back and wait for it to happen. There's so much we can do already, including the ideas you have all contributed.

It would seem that this has to be a multiform effort. A bit like a jigsaw puzzle. If we want to complete it we have to use all the pieces (options.)
Thumbs Up Thumbs Down
0
Kathlyn Stone on 09/04/2009 09:52:50
avatar
Last year atmospheric scientists looked at how smoke and ash from forest fires were giving the Arctic some cooling relief.

"Silver lining? Smoke from North American wildfires may block solar radiation in the Arctic" http://tinyurl.com/ng5kbg
Thumbs Up Thumbs Down
0
Tim James on 09/22/2009 13:35:47
avatar
I disagree because although volcanoes will cause sunlight to be reflected, once the sulphate particles have been reduced in the atmosphere then the same problem will still be there.

Also volcanoes have an abundance of carbon dioxide in them so man-made volcanoes will just increase the amount of CO2 in the atmosphere which will make the situation worse.
Thumbs Up Thumbs Down
0
r4 dsi on 12/22/2009 03:10:03
avatar
It is a very sensible topic I must say.I think man made volcanoes can slow down the climate change. But I think it is required more experiments.
Thumbs Up Thumbs Down
0
gaming accessories on 12/22/2009 06:13:23
avatar
I hadn't heard about the effect of volcanic ash reducing global temperature. If it can be proven to be successful, this should be implemented. Global warming is causing too much damage already. In another few centuries Long Island could cease to exist! Great article..
Thumbs Up Thumbs Down
0
ramon botella on 04/19/2010 03:50:33
avatar
Researches conducted by myself,have taken me to really believe that by releasing during some time into the atmosfare,on different locations,at the same time,sulpher particules;will finally stop the earth from warming up. it will not affect the rain pattern globally,and it will increase the total of snow fallen over each poles...
R.B.
Thumbs Up Thumbs Down
0
total: 10 | displaying: 1 - 10

Post your comment comment

Tags
Newsletter
eNews and updates
Sign up to receive breaking news as well as receive other site updates!

We comply with the HONcode standard for trustworthy health information: verify here .
Blog Communities

Flesh and Stone - Health and Science News - Blogged


Featured in Alltop
MBA Member

Newstin
BlogBurst.com
Subscribe with Bloglines

Journalist Blogs - Blog Catalog Blog Directory
http://www.wikio.com
Add to Technorati Favorites
View Kathlyn Stone's profile on LinkedIn
My Zimbio Top Stories