Home | Commentary | Would health care reform help you?

Would health care reform help you?

email Email to a friend
Font size: Decrease font Enlarge font

Barbara O'Brien points out some bright spots in the health reform bills.

Many obstacles and stumbling blocks remain in the way of health care reform. The House and Senate bills will have to be merged, and then the House and Senate both will vote on the final bill. We don’t yet know what will be in the final bill, or if the final bill will be passed into law. Passage will be especially difficult in the Senate, where it will need 60 votes to pass. It is still possible that after all this angst, just one grandstanding senator could kill the whole thing.

But just for fun, let’s look at what conventional wisdom says will be in the final bill and see if there is anything in it that will be an immediate benefit to people with mesothelioma cancer and other asbestos-related disease.

It is likely that the final bill will provide additional funding for state high-risk insurance pools. Currently more than 30 states run such pools, which are nonprofit, state-sponsored health insurance plans for people who can’t buy insurance because of pre-existing conditions. The biggest problem with such pools is that, often, the insurance they offer is too expensive for many who might need it. Both the Senate and House bills provide $5 billion in subsidies for state high-risk pools to make the insurance more affordable.

Under the Senate bill, beginning in 2014, private companies would no longer be able to deny coverage to adults with pre-existing conditions, nor could they charge higher premiums for people with pre-existing conditions. Until then, the state high-risk pools could provide some help.

Closing the Medicare Part D coverage gap — also called the “doughnut hole” — is another potential provision that could help some patients with asbestos-related disease. The “doughnut hole” is the gap between the coverage for yearly out-of-pocket expenses provided by Medicare Part D and Medicare’s “catastrophic coverage” threshold.

For example, in 2009 Medicare Part D paid at least 75 percent of what patients paid for prescription drugs up to $2,700. After that, patients must pay for all of their prescription medications until what they have paid exceeds $6,154. At that point, the catastrophic coverage takes over, and Medicare pays for all but 5 percent of the patient’s drug bills. The final health care reform bill probably will provide for paying at least 50 percent of out-of-pocket costs in the doughnut hole.

You may have heard the bills include budget cuts to the Medicare program, and this has been a big concern to many people. Proponents of the bill insist that savings can be found to pay for the cuts, and that people who depend on Medicare won’t face reduced services. But this is a complex issue that I want to address in a later post.

The long-term provisions probably will include many others that would benefit patients with asbestos-related disease, including increased funding for medical research. Although there are many complaints about the bill coming from all parts of the political spectrum, on the whole it would be a huge benefit to many people.

Barbara O’Brien contributes to many web sites including The Guardian’s Comment Is Free. Since 2008 she’s also been the Buddhism Guide for About.com. She launched her site, The Mahablog, in 2002.

Subscribe to comments feed Comments (3 posted):

cheap r4i card on 03/02/2010 20:44:25
avatar
Yes. Health insurance reform will help me.That isn't a sufficient political argument, however, for an individual mandate without a public option. In fact, it precludes my making that argument, because I am then the one making demands upon others to pony up and pay private corporations for my benefit.
Thumbs Up Thumbs Down
0
K. J. Lansing on 06/02/2010 14:22:52
avatar
Without a total anyone-who wants-to-buy into-Medicare public-type option, whatever Congress passes will be almost useless, and could even cause the medical care system to collapse under the oppressive thumb of the insurance companies.

For any bill to have any merit, the backs of the insurers must be broken, their monoploy, their money, their influence and their power taken away.

A proper bill would have that for starters, followed by:

*No! Zero! Zilch! advertising by any insurance or drug company...

[In Japan they banned all advertising of all drugs during dinner hour, because people were getting sick at having their meals ruined with "invasive" athleted foot, jock and vaginal itch and the like disgusting commericals. They get points for that even their cars have seen better quality control days.]

*No pre-existing conditions...
*No annual sign ups, you can sign up or switch plans at any time...
*Government purchases of prescription drugs, the same as foreign countries...
*No donut holes...
*All medical needs covered including dental...
*No more breaks for insurance companies. All the special favors' laws that Congress gave them for their special interest waived.

If my state, California, can have a co-op of auto insurers for the indigent and high-risk drivers on the cheap, then the states can do the same thing for health insurance.
Thumbs Up Thumbs Down
0
64gb usb flash drive on 15/02/2010 23:18:40
avatar
Hi Guy's,
I am then the one making demands upon others to pony up and pay private corporations for my benefit. -
Thumbs Up Thumbs Down
0
total: 3 | displaying: 1 - 3

Post your comment comment

Tags
No tags for this article
Newsletter
eNews and updates
Sign up to receive breaking news as well as receive other site updates!

We comply with the HONcode standard for trustworthy health information: verify here .
Blog Communities
Newstin BlogBurst.com Subscribe with Bloglines Journalist Blogs - Blog Catalog Blog Directory http://www.wikio.com Add to Technorati Favorites View Kathlyn Stone's profile on LinkedIn
My Zimbio Top Stories