Home | Commentary | Let's see if BPA really makes girls more aggressive

Let's see if BPA really makes girls more aggressive

email Email to a friend
Font size: Decrease font Enlarge font
image Venus flytrap. Photo: Robin Gallagher

Sandy Sand has a (tongue-in-cheek) suggestion for determining if BPA is indeed detrimental to our health.

Not to be too cynical, but should any of us be drinking or eating from plastic containers that contain BPA?

Whether they be rumor or factual, for years there have been claims that BPA (bisphenyl A) is leeched out from plastics and are of special concern to mothers who are bottle feeding their babies. So far, Connecticut and Minnesota, the city of Chicago and a county in New York have banned the sale of baby bottles, baby food containers and sippy cups containing BPA.

Of course, the plastic bottle and container industry is saying “pish-tosh” to the entire matter. What the hell do they care; they just want to sell merchandise in the cheapest, most convenient containers they can.

The consumer, too, wants the most convenient containers. If they didn't, billions of water bottles wouldn't be sold worldwide each year. One would also think that they'd want safe water bottles. Maybe they don't really care, or perhaps they aren't aware of the possible dangers from BPAs, or convenience simply outweighs safety.

I should state now that I don't know, and while I'm suspicious of the plastic bottles I continue to buy them because it's so convenient to throw a capped water bottle in my purse or keep one on my desk where there's less danger of it falling over and ruining my computer keyboard. In my defense -- if you can call it that, most of the water I drink comes from the tap, and that, too, has its "yuk" factor.

Skeptics such as me don’t believe anything manufacturers say about their products where health or product safety is concerned; that goes for the FDA, too. Both have been caught too many times in bald-faced lies.

That brings me to the recent study published in Environmental Health Perspectives which found that BPA may be making little girls more aggressive. The preliminary results of the 10-year study suggest that women who have high concentrations of BPA half-way through their pregnancy are more likely to have aggressive and hyperactive 2-year-old daughters.

The nipples used on bottles and pacifiers aren’t the focus of the study, but I have to wonder about them, too. They’re made from plastic and make the most immediate and continual contact with babies’ mouths, and whatever is sucked off of them has a direct route into the tots’ bloodstreams.

Perhaps a far-out experiment is in order.

Let’s take a bunch of those supposed felonious suspects -- the BPAs -- and feed them to Venus flytraps, insectivorous plants that voraciously gobble up their prey when they come too close.

With the name “Venus,” they must all be females, so let’s give the young plants an ample dose of BPA and see if they become even more aggressive in their insect eating by reaching out and attacking anything that comes flying or crawling near them.

Since plants mature far faster than humans, the Venus flytrap seems a likely subject for such an experiment (lending a very catchy name for the study), and maybe we can find out quickly -- and once and for all -- just how harmful BPA really is.

 

 

Subscribe to comments feed Comments (3 posted):

Michael Cosgrove on 10/12/2009 02:55:16
avatar
I just went to read the Wikipedia page on bisphenyl A (they call it bisphenol A) and, although like you I am not overly-cynical about chemicals, It does appear that there's an anomaly here.
The FDA has approved it, but it appears that it has been suspected of being harmful in areas as wide-ranging as obesity to breast-feeding to neurology to birth defects.
Now, on the basis, not very scientific I know, of 'They can't all be wrong'......
Europe says that the level found in babies is inferior to its definition of a harmful daily intake - 0.05 milligrams per kilo of body weight, but there is a large anti-bisphenol lobby.
Canada has quite simply banned it apparently.
Thumbs Up Thumbs Down
0
Sandy Sand on 10/14/2009 07:14:07
avatar
I, too, went to Wiki to see what BPA stands for and how to spell the chemical name.

If it were up to me, I'd be Canada and ban it...just to err on the side of safety. But then I'd ban all these chemicals in products and mercury in vaccines.

I don't trust anything the FDA says, anyway.
Thumbs Up Thumbs Down
0
valentines day on 12/09/2009 22:37:03
avatar
Do you know what BPA does to the human body? It mimics estrogen - a female hormone. The level of hormones in our bodies greatly affect our mood - just ask a women that has gone through menopause. Regardless much more studies of this nature need to be conducted to see what all these chemicals can do to our children’s health.
Thumbs Up Thumbs Down
0
total: 3 | displaying: 1 - 3

Post your comment comment

Tags
No tags for this article
Newsletter
eNews and updates
Sign up to receive breaking news as well as receive other site updates!

We comply with the HONcode standard for trustworthy health information: verify here .
Blog Communities

Flesh and Stone - Health and Science News - Blogged


Featured in Alltop
MBA Member

Newstin
BlogBurst.com
Subscribe with Bloglines

Journalist Blogs - Blog Catalog Blog Directory
http://www.wikio.com
Add to Technorati Favorites
View Kathlyn Stone's profile on LinkedIn
My Zimbio Top Stories